The Great Awokening denotes the pronounced leftward shift in attitudes toward race, gender, and equity among white liberals in the United States, with significant attitudinal changes accelerating from around 2010–2014 and intensifying further after 2020.^[1][2] This phenomenon, analyzed by political scientist Zach Goldberg through surveys and media data, reflects a divergence where white liberals' views on racial resentment and related issues moved more rapidly than those of other demographic groups, including minorities.^[1][3] Empirical indicators include a surge in terminology like "white privilege" and "systemic racism" in public discourse, correlating with heightened elite and media emphasis on identity-based social justice frameworks over class-oriented concerns.^[3] This cultural transformation has embedded such perspectives into institutions, influencing corporate policies, education, and political rhetoric, while distinguishing itself from prior progressive eras by its focus on performative moral signaling and collective emotions.^[2][3] Goldberg's research underscores media amplification as a key driver, with coverage of racial issues expanding dramatically and shaping elite opinion dynamics.^[3]

Definition and Origins

Definition

The Great Awokening denotes the pronounced leftward shift in attitudes among white liberals on issues of race, gender, and equity, characterized by heightened emphasis on systemic inequities and identity-based social justice frameworks, as analyzed by political scientist Zach Goldberg through his analysis of longitudinal polling and media data. It captures a divergence where white liberals increasingly adopted views—such as strong support for racial reparations and critiques of "whiteness"—that positioned them to the left of many minority respondents on analogous surveys.^[1][2] This attitudinal transformation unfolded roughly from 2010 to the early 2020s, with acceleration evident post-2014 in metrics like the exponential rise in public discourse around terms such as "white privilege" and "systemic racism," as tracked in media corpora and Google Ngram data. Goldberg's research highlights institutional adoption of equity priorities, including diversity initiatives prioritizing identity over class-based analyses, distinguishing this era from earlier progressive waves through its empirical scale and elite concentration.^[3][1] The term links to broader "woke" cultural dynamics but specifically emphasizes the data-driven surge in progressive orthodoxy among affluent, educated whites, often outpacing broader societal or minority consensus.^[4]

Origins

The intellectual origins of the Great Awokening trace back to postmodern theory, which critiqued objective truth and grand narratives in favor of analyzing power dynamics embedded in language and social structures, laying groundwork for identity-centric social critiques.^[5] This perspective influenced the development of intersectionality, a framework positing that identity markers such as race, gender, and class interact to produce unique, overlapping forms of oppression beyond single-axis analysis.^[6] A key transition occurred within left activism from class-based economic materialism to identity-based frameworks, exemplified by critical race theory's emphasis on race as the central lens for understanding systemic inequities and power relations.^[7] Pre-2010 academic foundations for equity drew from thinkers who advanced these ideas, prioritizing recognition of differential group experiences over color-blind or universalist approaches to justice. Early events like the 2008 election of Barack Obama further shaped these roots by highlighting racial identity in political mobilization, symbolizing progress while intensifying discourse on systemic barriers faced by marginalized groups.^[8] Occupy Wall Street's emergence reflected a partial pivot, as its initial class-focused protests began integrating identity politics amid broader activist debates.^[9]

Timeline of Events

Key events provided chronological markers for the attitudinal and discursive shifts defining the Great Awokening:

• 2008: Barack Obama's election as the first African American U.S. president amplified discussions of racial progress alongside persistent systemic inequities.^[8]
• 2012–2013: The shooting of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman and Zimmerman's acquittal spurred the creation of Black Lives Matter, heightening focus on racial profiling and extrajudicial violence.^[10]
• 2014: Unrest in Ferguson, Missouri, following the police shooting of Michael Brown, served as a flashpoint for shifting white liberal views on racial discrimination, per longitudinal polling.^[1]
• 2020: The police killing of George Floyd triggered extensive protests and institutional pledges to address racial equity, intensifying participation among white liberals in social justice advocacy.^[11]

Drivers and Manifestations

Key Drivers

Social media platforms accelerated the Great Awokening by facilitating the viral spread of progressive narratives on identity and equity, allowing elites to signal virtue and mobilize networks among white liberals. These platforms' algorithms prioritized emotionally charged content, amplifying outrage-driven discussions on race and gender that outpaced traditional media dissemination.^[2][3] Elite capture of institutions such as universities, news media, and corporations further propelled the shift, as leaders adopted social justice frameworks to align with emerging cultural norms and maintain status within progressive circles. In academia and media, this manifested in incentives for faculty and journalists to prioritize identity-focused research and reporting, fostering an environment where dissenting views faced marginalization.^[3][12] Quantitative studies highlight post-2010 surges in academic output and news media usage of terms like "racism," "sexism," and "white privilege," marking empirical drivers of the attitudinal cascade. Analyses of millions of articles reveal usage increases exceeding 400% in outlets like The New York Times, correlating with broader elite adoption and signaling the discourse's institutional entrenchment.^[13][14]

Cultural and Institutional Manifestations

The Great Awokening manifested culturally through heightened integration of social justice themes into entertainment and advertising, where productions and campaigns began prioritizing representations of diversity, equity, and inclusion to align with shifting public discourse on identity. Media trends during this period showed a marked increase in terminology associated with racial and gender equity, reflecting broader adoption in creative industries.^[1][15] In education, DEI initiatives proliferated, with universities implementing diversity-focused hiring practices and curriculum reforms that emphasized equity frameworks over traditional metrics. Public school systems, such as Seattle Public Schools, incorporated teachings on institutional racism and systemic inequities into their programs during the peak years around 2020.^[16][7] Corporations embraced "woke capitalism" by adopting diversity hiring goals and issuing performative statements on social justice issues, embedding equity considerations into business operations and public communications. These practices became standard in many institutions, signaling the movement's influence on professional environments.^[16][17] Policy shifts in public institutions further highlighted the era's focus, with government and nonprofit entities launching equity programs that prioritized identity-based outcomes in areas like training and resource allocation during the 2010s and early 2020s.^[7]

Criticisms and Backlash

Major Criticisms

Critics argue that the Great Awokening enforces ideological conformity and fosters cancel culture, diverting attention from economic inequality toward identity-based issues. Political scientist Adolph Reed Jr. has contended that this shift prioritizes symbolic gestures over class struggle, allowing elites to co-opt progressive rhetoric without addressing material disparities affecting working people.^[18] He views the emphasis on identity politics as a mechanism that fragments solidarity, substituting performative anti-racism for substantive economic reforms.^[19] Sociologist Musa al-Gharbi describes the phenomenon as driven by elite status competition among knowledge professionals, where adopting progressive stances on race and gender serves as a form of symbolic capital rather than genuine grassroots change.^[20] This dynamic, he argues, benefits affluent actors in media, academia, and tech by signaling moral superiority without challenging their own privileges or pursuing structural economic shifts.^[21] The Great Awokening's focus on identity over class is said to alienate working-class voters through perceived overreach, as progressive elites impose frameworks that resonate more in insulated institutional settings than among broader electorates facing economic precarity.^[22] This prioritization, critics maintain, undermines coalitions necessary for addressing inequality, framing dissent as moral failing and exacerbating divisions within left-leaning politics.^[23]

Evidence of Backlash

The 2023 Bud Light boycott, triggered by the brand's marketing partnership with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney, exemplified consumer resistance, resulting in a sales decline of up to 32% in the fourth quarter of that year and an estimated $1.4 billion loss for Anheuser-Busch InBev.^[24][25] This backlash extended to Bud Light's market position, dropping it to third in U.S. beer sales behind Modelo and Michelob Ultra.^[26] Electoral outcomes post-2020 reflected broader pushback, with Donald Trump's 2024 victory interpreted as a rejection of progressive identity politics associated with the Great Awokening.^[27] This shift aligned with populist responses to cultural changes intensified after events like the 2020 George Floyd protests.^[28] Polling data indicated growing unfavorable perceptions of "woke" ideology, with statistical analyses showing a decline in support for associated opinions and practices by 2024.^[29] Institutional responses included policy challenges to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, with over 100 anti-DEI bills introduced in state legislatures and several corporations scaling back programs amid legal and public scrutiny.^[30][31] Public opinion reversals manifested in reversals at universities and companies, where DEI commitments faced lawsuits and executive decisions to prioritize merit-based approaches.^[32]

Decline and Legacy

Signs of Decline

Following the peak around 2020–2022, media usage of terms associated with identity-focused discourse, such as "woke" and related concepts, has shown signs of diminishment, with mentions in television peaking in 2021 and in popular books reaching a high in 2022 before declining.^[29] This reduction aligns with broader retreats in corporate communications, where U.S. firms have scaled back explicit references to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives since 2020, driven by perceived risks to reputation and finances.^[33] Post-2024 elections, numerous companies implemented policy rollbacks on DEI programs, including Walmart, Lowe's, and Meta eliminating or curtailing commitments to diversity targets and related metrics, amid a 68% drop in "DEI" mentions in corporate filings from 2024 to 2025.^{[34] [35]} Surveys reflect stabilization or shifts in attitudes, with support for movements like Black Lives Matter falling from 67% in 2020 to 51% in 2023 across the public, and polling indicating reduced embrace of gender-neutral language even among non-white groups by 2024.^{[36] [37]} These trends have been influenced by prior backlash events, such as legal challenges and consumer responses, prompting institutions to recalibrate amid mounting costs.^[38] Over 2,600 DEI-related jobs were eliminated by U.S. employers since early 2023, underscoring a retreat from overt signaling in favor of more neutral corporate postures.^[39]

Long-term Legacy

The Great Awokening has entrenched social justice frameworks within key institutions, leading to enduring shifts in corporate governance, educational curricula, and public policy frameworks that prioritize equity and identity considerations over traditional merit-based approaches. These changes, including the proliferation of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, continue to shape organizational cultures and hiring practices, even amid evolving public sentiments. For instance, human resources departments have expanded administrative processes rooted in these principles, mirroring persistent legacies from prior cultural shifts.^[40] Historians and analysts draw parallels between the Great Awokening and earlier U.S. moral awakenings, such as those in the 1920s and 1960s, which similarly arose from elite anxieties over social hierarchies, moral purity, and perceived systemic injustices. These cycles often reflect periodic intensifications of progressive fervor among intellectual and cultural elites, resulting in temporary upheavals followed by institutionalized norms that influence subsequent generations. Zach Goldberg's analysis of attitudinal data underscores how such elite-driven shifts, focused on racial and identity issues, embed themselves into broader discourse and policy, while left-leaning critics like Musa al-Gharbi highlight the quasi-religious dimensions that sustain cultural momentum.^[21][1][4] As of 2025, these legacies manifest in ongoing debates over identity-centric policies, with Goldberg's metrics indicating that while peak intensities have moderated, the foundational attitudinal realignments among white liberals persist in elite circles, informing cultural production and institutional decision-making.^[41]